Who guards the algorithms that shape our lives? This SE Press bridge essay probes algorithmic bias and digital injustice, revealing why only adversarial audits, walkout rights, and public repair can keep AI and data governance contestable. Learn how Scientific Existentialism’s living protocols make digital power challenge-ready, forkable, and open to all dissent.

In an era of rapid and unpredictable technological change, how can societies guarantee justice, adaptability, and resilience? This paper sets out cross-linked, registry-locked protocols—plural audit with minority veto, platinum privilege safeguards, auto-reversion, and living scenario registries—to ensure robust, corrigible governance for all futures.