A formal protocol for defining, auditing, and protecting wisdom as an operational boundary within SE—balancing embodied expertise, integrative judgment, and ethical stewardship. Employs plural testimony, recursive review, and trauma/culture sensitivity to ensure wisdom is recognized, safeguarded, and maintained as a core epistemic asset, distinct from mere knowledge or skill.

A protocol safeguarding boundaries of embodied know-how and direct intuition—where analytic articulation fails and validity is best established by demonstration or non-verbal feedback. Ensures plural testimony, trauma/culture sensitivity, and recursive audit while explicitly protecting tacit and intuitional knowledge from reductionist override.

A rigorous protocol for formally auditing and protecting identity-anchoring boundaries rooted in story, myth, or narrative. Resists reductionism and analytic override, upholds plural witnessing, ensures trauma/culture sensitivity, and distinguishes narrative meaning from empirical fact. Migration only with unanimous consent and cross-protocol review.

A protocol for rigorously identifying, safeguarding, and auditing irreducible epistemic differences—plural boundaries—within the Scientific Existentialism ecosystem. Protects genuine paradigm, value, or cultural disagreements from forced consensus and assimilation, requiring explicit panel consent for any migration and trauma-sensitive reviews for minority perspectives.

A protocol for archiving and rigorously reviewing irreducible experiences of awe, wonder, and the sublime that resist analytic closure. Emphasizes triage, adversarial review, plural testimony, and minority/cultural safeguards to preserve epistemic humility, integrity, and non-flattening documentation of boundary phenomena.

A meta-audit protocol that governs irreducible dignity claims across individual, collective, legal, and sacred domains. Ensures plural witnessing, trauma-informed safeguards, adversarial review, and claimant veto. Dignity boundaries remain unviolated through rigorous classification, encrypted archiving, and controlled migration to ethics or care protocols only with consent.

A canonical protocol for archiving and safeguarding suffering claims—physical, existential, trauma, and testimonial—irreducible to analytic audit. Prioritizes testimonial justice, trauma-informed dignity, claimant sovereignty, plural archiving, adversarial resilience, and data security. Enables living context, cross-disciplinary migration, and recursive review in philosophy, ethics, and social science.