How can dissent become a source of resilience and renewal in knowledge systems? This Bridge Essay examines how historical records safeguard contested viewpoints, ensure memory of dissent, and empower future epistemic adaptation. It explores protocols that turn conflict and refusal into fuel for plural wisdom, continuous critique, and adaptive integrity across generations.

Plural Safeguards delivers a blueprint for resilience using dissent, challenge-integration, and exit options to prevent lock-in and systemic bias, advancing adaptive, justice-driven governance and knowledge.

Is objective truth possible? This SE Press bridge essay journeys through Scientific Existentialism’s protocols for truth-seeking, contestation, and revision. Discover how plural perspectives and recursive challenge shape a dynamic, revision-ready approach to knowledge.