Who decides what is ethical when nothing is certain? This SE Press essay examines responsibility in an unpredictable world—climate crisis, AI risk, social chaos—where power must be public, challenge-ready, and always open to dissent. Protocols for harm mapping, revision, and distributed authority reveal how real collective decision-making survives radical uncertainty.

Is there a “good life” for all in a fractured future? This SE Press essay reframes flourishing as a living protocol: pluralist, public, and open to repair, fork, and dissent. True universality means transparency, upgradeability, and the courage to let those harmed rewrite the rules—again and again, in the open. Explore how Scientific Existentialism makes the good life a system, not a slogan.

Is justice ever truly just, or do all fairness systems mask new injustices? This SE Press bridge essay argues that real justice means open contestability, public repair, and plural challenge. Explore how Scientific Existentialism transforms justice into a living protocol—where minority veto, exit, and adversarial audits keep systems honest and upgradeable.

SE Press platinum justice empowers walkouts, genealogical repair, and resource parity—making every system contestable, reparable, and able to be paused or inherited by global coalitions.

Explore Scientific Existentialism’s definitive answers to ethics, morality, and moral intelligence. This essay anchors SE’s plural, protocol-locked approach—defining justice, value, the good life, and responsibilities across society, technology, and the planet, with transparent reasoning and open challenge built in.