How should a plural protocol system respond when sanctuary protects harm? This Bridge Essay explores the balance between safeguarding dissent and enabling ethical override. It examines protocols for harm detection, adaptation, and recursive audit, proposing practical safeguards to ensure interventions reform injustice without erasing difference or dignity.

SE Press platinum algorithmic ethics turns transparency into collective power: walkouts, adversarial audits, and bloodline repair give users and proxies immediate tools to contest, suspend, and improve every system—forever.

Responsibility at SE Press is protocol-audited, adversarially contestable, and includes the right to repair, veto, refuse, and exit. Tortoise thresholds, proxy credits, SI recusal, and divorce clauses make duty a safeguard—never a tyranny.