A rigorous protocol for formally auditing and protecting identity-anchoring boundaries rooted in story, myth, or narrative. Resists reductionism and analytic override, upholds plural witnessing, ensures trauma/culture sensitivity, and distinguishes narrative meaning from empirical fact. Migration only with unanimous consent and cross-protocol review.

A protocol for rigorously identifying, safeguarding, and auditing irreducible epistemic differences—plural boundaries—within the Scientific Existentialism ecosystem. Protects genuine paradigm, value, or cultural disagreements from forced consensus and assimilation, requiring explicit panel consent for any migration and trauma-sensitive reviews for minority perspectives.

A protocol for systematic triage, documentation, and adversarial review of claims of absolute certainty—distinguishing foundational axioms from novel, operational certainty boundaries. Permanent status requires supermajority adversarial exhaustion and documented necessity, guarding system integrity and openness to plural paradigms.

A protocol for archiving and rigorously reviewing irreducible experiences of awe, wonder, and the sublime that resist analytic closure. Emphasizes triage, adversarial review, plural testimony, and minority/cultural safeguards to preserve epistemic humility, integrity, and non-flattening documentation of boundary phenomena.

A meta-audit protocol that governs irreducible dignity claims across individual, collective, legal, and sacred domains. Ensures plural witnessing, trauma-informed safeguards, adversarial review, and claimant veto. Dignity boundaries remain unviolated through rigorous classification, encrypted archiving, and controlled migration to ethics or care protocols only with consent.