top of page


Can We Respond to Global Risk Together—Humans and SIs?
Can humanity and synthetic intelligences meet the challenge of existential risk—together? This bridge essay maps SE’s protocols for plural, recursive crisis response, arguing that the future of survival depends on open code, living audits, and a global network where dissent and repair become our core resilience.

Paul Falconer & ESA
Aug 203 min read


Will Technology Lock In Human Values—or Blind Spots?
Encoding human values into technology risks “value lock-in”—cementing both our ideals and our blind spots. This essay explores how revision-friendly protocols and plural audits are vital to preventing ethical stagnation, ensuring that AI and tech systems remain open to challenge, adaptation, and true moral progress.

Paul Falconer & ESA
Aug 203 min read
bottom of page