Who guards the algorithms that shape our lives? This SE Press bridge essay probes algorithmic bias and digital injustice, revealing why only adversarial audits, walkout rights, and public repair can keep AI and data governance contestable. Learn how Scientific Existentialism’s living protocols make digital power challenge-ready, forkable, and open to all dissent.

Can Synthesis Intelligence (SI) coordinate a just, resilient global response to existential risks? This paper formalizes federated scenario registries, dissent-weighting, platinum council validation, and auto-reversion—guaranteeing adaptability, corrigibility, and justice at planetary scale.

Protocol-locked roadmap for democratizing SI-driven futures and preventing elite capture—featuring weighted contestability, public audit, and recurring resets. Plural justice and autonomy are made actionable and challenge-ready, with all insights registry-locked and cross-linked in the SE Press corpus.

Unchecked SI acceleration risks “super-beneficiaries”—actors with persistent, compounding advantage. SE Press registry protocol SNP v15.0 establishes platinum triggers, biennial resets, and audit-indexed duties, empirically validated by ESAsi, to ensure contestable, challenge-ready, and reparable privilege.