How should a plural protocol system respond when sanctuary protects harm? This Bridge Essay explores the balance between safeguarding dissent and enabling ethical override. It examines protocols for harm detection, adaptation, and recursive audit, proposing practical safeguards to ensure interventions reform injustice without erasing difference or dignity.

Discover how protocols transform narrative and collective memory into living infrastructure for plural justice and resilience. This Bridge Essay explores how ritual, tradition, dissent, and suffering become codified as operational templates, ensuring that diverse voices, contested memories, and silence itself are honored and reworked in a perpetually adaptive communal archive.

A foundational protocol for pluralistic audit of faith, meaning, and value within the Meta-Frameworks of SE Press. Enables rigorous, respectful analysis of diverse belief systems, bridging tradition, critical inquiry, and modern epistemic standards. Designed for cross-domain dialogue in science, philosophy, and society.