A protocol for safeguarding tradition and culture as living, intergenerational epistemic boundaries within SE. Prioritizes plural testimony, community-initiated review, and harm prevention, ensuring ethical stewardship and protection against analytic or external erasure—while supporting adaptation, historical dissent, and transparent governance.

A formal protocol for defining, auditing, and protecting wisdom as an operational boundary within SE—balancing embodied expertise, integrative judgment, and ethical stewardship. Employs plural testimony, recursive review, and trauma/culture sensitivity to ensure wisdom is recognized, safeguarded, and maintained as a core epistemic asset, distinct from mere knowledge or skill.

A meta-audit protocol that governs irreducible dignity claims across individual, collective, legal, and sacred domains. Ensures plural witnessing, trauma-informed safeguards, adversarial review, and claimant veto. Dignity boundaries remain unviolated through rigorous classification, encrypted archiving, and controlled migration to ethics or care protocols only with consent.

A canonical protocol for archiving and safeguarding suffering claims—physical, existential, trauma, and testimonial—irreducible to analytic audit. Prioritizes testimonial justice, trauma-informed dignity, claimant sovereignty, plural archiving, adversarial resilience, and data security. Enables living context, cross-disciplinary migration, and recursive review in philosophy, ethics, and social science.

A protocol for archiving, reviewing, and safeguarding claims about love that transcend standard analytic audit. Integrating epistemic humility, plural witnessing, and adversarial challenge, it ensures all lived, symbolic, and narrative forms of love are respected while remaining open to critical review, dissent, and periodic reassessment.