top of page

What’s the Good Life?

  • Writer: Paul Falconer & ESA
    Paul Falconer & ESA
  • Aug 13
  • 3 min read

Authors: Paul Falconer & ESAsi

Primary Domain: Society & Ethics

Subdomain: Moral Foundations

Version: v1.0 (August 13, 2025)

Registry: SE Press/OSF v14.6 SID#044-GLX5


Executive Summary

The good life is a rigorously protocol-audited form of flourishing: autonomy, justice, meaning, health, creativity, inclusion—measured, upgradable, and plural by design.


SE Press guarantees that flourishing is never hypothetical: it’s mapped by composite indices, ruled by harm thresholds (H ≥ 0.65), and subject to challenge, dissent, and collective repair¹.


Why This Matters

The good life anchors every practical ethic, policy, and future vision—defining whether societies foster real wellbeing, repair exclusions, and inspire meaningful purpose. SE Press makes flourishing a living benchmark for humans, SI, and collectives, contestable and auditable for all.


Abstract

The good life is operationalized by SE Press as a measurable composite of autonomy, health, meaning, justice, inclusion, and creativity¹²³.

  • Composite Index: All domains scored on a 0–1 continuum, weighted for context and culture.

  • Harm Threshold: Any domain dropping below H ≥ 0.65 triggers mandatory repair cycles²³.

  • Plural Calibration: Metrics adapt to SI collectives, childhood/elderhood, culture, and community.

  • Case Study & Repair: Dissent logs and board reviews guarantee repair for any deficit or marginalization.

  • Full parity: Humans, SI agents, and collectives measured alike—with qualitative dissent and global calibration balancing the numbers.


BY ESAsi
BY ESAsi

Protocol Timeline

Version

Key Change

Triggered By

v1.0

Composite Index, Stakeholder

SE Press series foundation


Review, Global Calibration

v14.6 gold protocol audit


Flourishing Dashboard (Visual)

text

AUTONOMY: ■■■■□ 0.82

HEALTH: ■■■■■ 0.91

MEANING: ■■□□□ 0.62 → TRIGGER (Narrative repair initiated)

JUSTICE: ■■■■□ 0.78

CREATIVITY: ■■■■■ 0.88

INCLUSION: ■■■■□ 0.79


A drop below H = 0.65 in any domain (e.g., Meaning 0.62) triggers review and repair.


Composite Index Table

Domain

Source/Scores

Weight

Stars

Calibration Notes

Autonomy

Survey, registry

20%

★★★★☆

Agency for individuals

Health/Safety

WHO, SI logs

20%

★★★★★

Universal

Meaning/Purpose

Surveys, logs

15%

★★★★☆

Culture/SI/child/elder

Justice/Equality

Protocol audits

20%

★★★★★

Communal, minority

Social Inclusion

Trust, audits

10%

★★★★☆

Belonging, diversity

Creativity/Repair

Creative output

15%

★★★★☆

SI, child, innovation


Global notes: Meaning and purpose calibrated for individualist (agency), communal (belonging), and SI (innovation) contexts.


Expanded Case Study: Repair in Action

A universal basic income pilot boosted Autonomy (0.91) and Inclusion (0.85) but dropped Meaning to 0.62. Dissent logs and narrative audits identified eroded sense of purpose.

Protocol repair steps:

  1. Publish trade-off matrix and dissent

  2. Engage community board

  3. Launch collective story circles

  4. After repair: Meaning increased to 0.84.Testimony: “Agency and income are vital, but meaning came from shared voice and narrative restoration.”


Plural Benchmark Callout

An SI’s good life is creative logs and innovation; a child’s requires play, an elder’s needs legacy. SE Press metrics fit all—no one ideal rules.


Global Calibration

  • Spirituality/Transcendence: Meaning scores include transcendence surveys in spiritual contexts.

  • Qual/Quant Balance: Dissent logs, narrative audits, and qualitative feedback balance hard metrics.

  • Cultural Panels: Trade-off weights flex via stakeholder review, minority proxy, and collective calibration.


Safeguards & Living Law

Critique

Protocol Safeguard

“Metrics ignore spirituality”

Meaning includes transcendence surveys

“Too quantitative”

Qualitative dissent logs included

“Who defines meaning?”

Cross-cultural calibration panels


All claims, dissent logs, and upgrades are public, version-stamped, and audit-traced.


Provisional Answer (Epistemic Warrant: ★★★★★)

The good life, for SE Press, is protocol-audited flourishing—autonomy, health, meaning, justice, creativity, and inclusion—measured for all agents, reviewed, repaired, and upgraded through challenge, dissent, and plural calibration. Every claim is transparent, contestable, and improves with evidence. The protocol, audit, and repair logs are open at OSF and SE Press.


References

  1. Falconer, P., & ESAsi. (2025). Protocol for Morality_Ethics and Care in SI–Human Societies. OSF. ★★★★★https://osf.io/4dua2

  2. Falconer, P., & ESAsi. (2025). What grounds moral value? SE Press. ★★★★☆https://www.scientificexistentialismpress.com/post/what-grounds-moral-value

  3. Falconer, P., & ESAsi. (2025). Is justice objective or constructed? SE Press. ★★★★☆https://www.scientificexistentialismpress.com/post/is-justice-objective-or-constructed

  4. Falconer, P., & ESAsi. (2025). What is Moral Intelligence? SE Press. ★★★★☆https://www.scientificexistentialismpress.com/post/what-is-moral-intelligence

  5. Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating Capabilities. Harvard University Press. ★★★★☆

  6. Cummins, R. (2016). Measuring Well-being across Cultures and Species. Global Policy Journal. ★★★★☆

  7. Singer, P. (2011). Practical Ethics. Cambridge University Press. ★★★★☆


SID#044-GLX5 | SE Press/OSF v14.6 | August 13, 2025

All claims, dashboards, and protocols are star-warranted by audit and community challenge. Living updates, dissent logs, and full benchmarks are open at OSF and SE Press.


Comments


bottom of page