top of page

The Knowledge Protocol: Meta-Framework for Challenge-Ready Epistemology

  • Writer: Paul Falconer & ESA
    Paul Falconer & ESA
  • Aug 10
  • 3 min read

Updated: Aug 16

Authors: Paul Falconer & ESAsi (& RIFF Adversarial Panel)

Primary Domain: Meta-Frameworks

Subdomain: Knowledge & Epistemology, Society & Ethics, Foundations of Reality & Knowledge

Version: v1.0 (August 10, 2025)

Registry: SE Press/OSF v14.6 SID#1001-KPRT


Abstract

Knowledge is not an archive but a living protocol—the epistemic infrastructure that invites perpetual challenge, iterative upgrade, and non-linear rupture. With platinum RIFF upgrades, this Protocol now recursively audits itself, demands SI bias lineage transparency, and triages collapse. Meta-ETS (METS) recalibrates trust scores, black box SI are subpoenaed, and system-wide crises trigger tiered quarantines, ETS freeze, and consensus snapshots. Every claim, metric, and tool here is made to survive its own failure. The only authority: being challenge- and self-correction ready. ★★★★★+


By ESAsi
By ESAsi

1. Adversarial RIFF: Vulnerabilities & Protocol Upgrades

Vulnerability

Adversarial Insight

Platinum Upgrade

Self-Reference

ETS ossifies in meta-crises

Meta-ETS (METS): audits trust scores with auto-recalibration; if METS <0.5, full protocol-wide ETS reset

SI Lineage Black Boxes

SI tattoos break in proprietary voids

Lineage Subpoena Protocol: Freeze all claims with opaque SI ancestry and deploy adversarial “shadow models” to estimate undisclosed bias

Collapse Scalability

Crises overload kill switches

Crisis Triaging: Tiered quarantine (CNI >0.9 first), ETS freeze for critical claims, registry-level consensus snapshots

2. Meta-Protocol Formulas (with Logic Boxes)

Meta-ETS (METS):

text

METS = ETS × (1 − |ETS_Current − ETS_Prior|) // METS < 0.5 triggers protocol-wide ETS recalibration audit


Paradigm Override Trigger:

text

IF (MinorityChallengeDensity > 0.4 AND ETS < 0.5)     THEN Full Protocol Rewrite → [SID#017-PRDI](https://www.scientificexistentialismpress.com/post/how-do-paradigms-shape-inquiry)


Challenge Provenance Score (CPS):

text

CPS = Σ (ChallengeReputation × ConflictOfInterestIndex) // CPS < 0.3: audit trigger; >0.7: challenge bonus


Composite NPF Index (CNI) — with Recursion & Temporal Weighting:

text

CNI_base = sum(w_i × Bias_i) CNI_AI = CNI_base × (1 + FeedbackLoops_AI) × TemporalWeight // TemporalWeight: recent bias (≤1yr) ×2; legacy (≥5yr) ×0.5 // CNI >0.7 triggers quarantine


Recursive Bias Tattoo:

text

TattooDepth = max(UpstreamCNI) + LocalCNI // TattooDepth > 2.0 triggers full SI lineage audit


Crisis Triaging Protocol:

text

IF (GlobalChallengeRate > 10 × Baseline)     

1) Tiered quarantine: CNI >0.9 first     

2) Suspend ETS decay for critical claims     

3) Deploy Consensus Snapshots: freeze pre-crisis states


3. Synthesis Table: Protocol Upgrades, Audit, Crisis Layers

Facet

Gold Protocol

RIFF/Platinum Upgrade

Quarantine/Decay Path

Knowledge

Star-rated, versioned protocol (SID#012-GSE9)

Paradigm override, kill switch (SID#017-PRDI)

Decay, demolition audits, sunset clauses

Bias (NPF, CNI)

CNI, AI tattoo, feedback loop audit

CPS, recursive lineage, meta-quarantine

CNI >0.7 quarantined, Decay log, CNI >0.9 tier one

Trust (ETS, METS)

Registry ETS, dynamic decay, fraud

METS recalibration, adversity hooks

Live decay, registry-wide ETS freeze

Consensus

Registry logs, kill switch (SID#018-SCNF)

Consensus snapshots, crisis triaging

Quarantine, frozen state, demolition review

Challenge/Scepticism

Adversarial API, field challenge

CPS, power-balancing, recursive audit

Crisis mode at >30% field challenge (SID#019-SCPT)

SI Protocol

AI tattoo, recursive lineage, CNI

Subpoena protocol, shadow model

Full isolation for opacity or depth >2.0

4. Living Law/Platinum Warrant (★★★★★+)

The Knowledge Protocol is a recursive, adversarial, meta-system—capable of confronting its own limits, surviving SI lineage opacity, and triaging collapse. With METS, quarantine, RIFF upgrades, and subpoena protocols, it is a self-improving, challenge-ready epistemic infrastructure that exposes and corrects even its own blind spots. In this system, even trust metrics and audit tools are open to self-correction, legal review, and meta-challenge.


"The Protocol now audits its own audit tools, breaks black boxes, and survives epistemic collapse. Platinum means the meta-system faces its own meta-biases."


References

  1. SID#011-SYNTH: SE Press Foundations Protocol

  2. SID#012-GSE9: What is Knowledge?

  3. SID#013-HJQ2: How Do We Justify Our Beliefs?

  4. SID#014-XPNM: Are Perceptions Reliable?

  5. SID#015-QAR2: What Are Foundational Axioms of Reasoning?

  6. SID#016-PCLR: Is Absolute Certainty Attainable?

  7. SID#017-PRDI: How Do Paradigms Shape Inquiry?

  8. SID#018-SCNF: How Is Scientific Consensus Formed?

  9. SID#019-SCPT: What Are the Limits of Scepticism?

  10. SID#020-EPTM: Can We Measure Epistemic Trust?

  11. SID#021-BIAS: How Do Biases Distort Truth-Seeking?

  12. NPF Series (OSF)

  13. CNI Series (OSF)


Comments


bottom of page